Saturday, August 6, 2011

Fire at Barnum's Menagerie


Woodcut engraving published in Harper's Weekly, Jan. 1887. Does anyone know how many elephant's Barnum actually had in the menagerie at this time?

Barnum's Circus


Woodcut engraving published in Harper's Weekly, Nov. 1889

Barnum's elephants


Woodcut engraving published in Harper's Weekly, Jan. 1883. The drawing on the lower right purporting to be teaching the elephant to stand on it's head is odd, with a block and tackle around it's trunk lifting it's head up, and the rope around it's foot lifting it up?

Ancient Zoological Expedition

Woodcut engraving published in Harper's Weekly, July 1873

P.T. Barnum's "The World of Contribution."


Woodcut engraving published in Harper's Weekly March, 1873

Lucas "downed and browned!!"


This woodcut engraving was published in Harper's Weekly Sept, 1869. Does anyone know any more about "Lucas" or what organization he was affiliated with?

Friday, August 5, 2011

Circus Trainer?


This is an unusual post card as it suggests the participants are dining in a restaurant, but it sure looks like a cage has been "fixed" up to look like a restaurant?

Congo Work Elephant

Ceylon Elephants



How much has the world changed???


Peter Bennsinger and Mrs Pierre Blouk present a Rhinoceros Foot made into an ashtray to Marlin Perkins and his wife as they are about to leave the Lincoln Park Zoo to work at the St Louis Zoo Sept 21 1962

Thursday, August 4, 2011

For Anonymous

The don't believe the costume came over from Germany with Gunther, but as you can tell by the clip below it was similar in style to the jacket he wore for the riding act in Germany. The "scroll embellishments" on the jacket for sale are classic "Don Foote/Eaves-Brookes" and most likely made for GGW's premier appearance on American shores.

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

What an incredible piece of circus history!!!!!!

I received this email, and was flabbergasted that this jacket has remained hidden all these years. I believe this was GGW's first costume jacket worn for the ridding act when first appearing on the GSOE. Double amazing there appears to be blood stains from an injury by the tiger. Given the strides in DNA sequencing and cloning that have taken place the past few years, this may be a solution to the sorry state of wild animal act's and circus excitement in general. Make another Boss and do a Back By Popular Demand Tour.



Hi, I saw this item on eBay and thought you might be interested.

GUNTHER GEBEL WILLIAMS COSTUM JACKET 1968 MUSEUM PIECE!
GUNTHER GEBEL WILLIAMS COSTUM JACKET 1968 MUSEUM PIECE!
Current price:
$5,999.00
End time:Aug-04-11 09:40:43 PDT

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Asian Elephants Are Social Networkers

Social smarts. Asian elephants have many long-term friendships.
Credit: Shermin de Silva

Asian elephants have long been considered somewhat antisocial. Instead of living in large, tightly knit herds, as do female elephants on the African savanna, those in Asia were thought to have only small groups of friends and few outside connections. But a new study shows that many female Asian elephants are more like social butterflies, with numerous pals. And they're able to maintain strong friendships even with those they have not seen in a year or more.

The study adds Asian elephants to a short list of other species, including dolphins, that are able to maintain complex social relationships despite not having daily contact, an ability regarded as being cognitively demanding.

"People thought they knew what Asian elephants were doing [socially] based on what they saw them doing in captivity," says Shermin de Silva, a behavioral ecologist with the Elephant, Forest and Environment Conservation Trust in Colombo, Sri Lanka, and the lead author of the new study. Asian elephants are also extremely difficult to study in the wild, she adds. They inhabit dense forests, so researchers are usually able to observe the animals only by climbing tall trees or watching them when they gather at water holes.

But 30 years ago, one population of Asian elephants on Sri Lanka became observable because it lost its forest home. People logged the trees, converted the land into teak plantations, and subsequently dammed the region's main river, creating the large Uda Walawe reservoir. In 1972, 308 square kilometers around the reservoir were made into the Udawalawe National Park. Some 800 to 1200 former forest elephants now live here on grass- and scrublands that resemble an East African savanna, de Silva says.

The open landscape made it possible for de Silva and her team to identify 286 individual adult female Asian elephants, they report in the current issue of BMC Ecology. The researchers then tracked the social relationships of 51 of these elephants over a 2-year period. Almost immediately, de Silva realized that the elephants had larger social networks than previously recognized. Adult females she saw hanging together one day were often not together the next but were with other individuals.

"It was said that Asian elephants usually had only three friends" and loose associations with others, implying an unstable social structure, de Silva says. "But we found they can have 10 or more; some even have 50 friends," de Silva says, adding that these are not random associations. The scientists identified the elephants' "friends" or "companions" as those individuals within 500 meters of one another who were moving, resting, or sharing resources. Those females with the most friends tended to be unfaithful pals, often dropping elephants that the researchers thought were their five "best friends forever" for a new set. Those with the fewest number of friends proved to be the most loyal. How genetically related these adult elephants are is not known but will be investigated in a future study, the researchers say.

Although some Asian elephants may not see certain companions for long stretches of time—more than a year in some cases—they are probably in touch in other ways, de Silva says, because elephants can communicate both chemically and acoustically over long distances. "The 'herd' one sees at any given time is often only a fragment of a much larger social group."

The researchers' statistical analysis of the elephants' relationships shows that female Asian elephants live in a highly dynamic and fluid society, with individuals leaving and rejoining, much as chimpanzees and bottlenose dolphins are known to do. "Elephants showed their tightest bonds during the dry season," de Silva says. When water resources are scarce, some elephant friends would team up to drive others they did not know away from pools.

"It's an intriguing study on two fronts," says George Wittemyer, a wildlife biologist at Colorado State University, Fort Collins. "First, it provides the basic socioecology of a high profile but surprisingly poorly studied species." And second, "it describes a relatively unique social system" that can be understood only by observing it for several years. "It's fascinating," adds Phyllis Lee, a behavioral ecologist at the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom and a member of the Amboseli Elephant Research Project. "The question becomes how do they maintain these relationships," because what the elephants are doing "requires a high level of cognitive capacity," as any social networking maven well knows.

*This article has been corrected. The new research was published in BMC Ecology.

'This is how a "pro" spins it, Larry.''

Elephant battle rages as circus comes to Toronto


Months after a protracted battle over Toronto Zoo’s three elephants resulted in the decision to move them away, two new pachyderms have just rolled into town — and animal activists are not pleased.

The Shrine Circus, operating in the parking lot of Centerpoint Mall, features two elephants. The beasts are trotted out twice every performance for rides at $10 a pop and perform tricks during one segment of the show. The circus is a fundraiser for charities supported by the local Shriners’ chapter.

The mall’s Facebook page has become a flashpoint for criticism directed at the show’s organizers.

Protests are planned for every show this weekend at the Yonge St. and Steeles Ave. mall.

Susan Morris, who organized the demonstrations, has been protesting the Shrine Circus elephants’ treatment for three years. “They basically live on a truck and in a parking lot.

“I’m trying to get people to see that maybe it’s not right and to go for circuses that don’t have animals,” she said.

Larry Solheim, general manager for TZ Productions which produces the circus, said the elephants do well under the company’s care.

“Elephants thrive in captivity,” he said, adding they are transported in custom-built trailers and their average trip is 100 kilometres. On the road, they live in a compound with climate-controlled facilities.

The company’s herd of around eight animals lives in Florida when they are not performing.

Solheim said the company has performed at eight sites in the GTA, and that the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals has inspected each without incident.

The question of whether exotic animals should be allowed to perform in Toronto isn’t new. In 1992, city council passed a controversial bylaw banning all exotic animal acts.

It was struck down the following year after a bitter legal fight, with the Ontario Court of Appeal ruling the ban was outside the city’s jurisdiction.

However, the province’s Municipal Act was later amended so municipalities could pass broader bylaws on animals. In 2008, the OSPCA Act clarified that where provincial and municipal regulations conflict on animal welfare, “the provision that affords the greater protection to animals shall prevail.”

A city bylaw prohibits a person from keeping “either on a temporary or permanent basis” certain animals, including elephants and horses.

However, circuses are an exception, said Elizabeth Glibbery, the city’s Animal Services manager. Keeping in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling, the city has no bylaw relating to exotic animal acts.

“When it comes to cruelty of animals, they (the province) have a lead,” Glibbery said, adding the OSPCA would handle complaints about the circus animals’ welfare.

Solheim said the question of whether the animals should be at the circus is “a moral choice, more than a scientific choice. There’s no credible scientific evidence to show that this is detrimental to animals,” he said.

“It really comes down to what do you believe?” Solheim said, since elephants are social animals that require company and mental stimulation, they are better off in circuses than zoos, where they tend to get bored.

Toronto’s zoo board decided to send away its three elephants to another zoo or sanctuary after concerns over costs and the aging animals’ comfort emerged. Three is the minimum recommended number for a herd according to the American Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

The circus will be in Toronto until Monday.


'I wonder where Mr. Solheim got his fact's about zoo elephants, and the statement that "they are better off in circuses then zoos?" I would also be interested in seeing one of these, " On the road, they live in a compound with climate-controlled facilities!!!" It must be a bear to transport from city to city. I guess that is how times have changed. They used to be called hockey arena's in Canada!!!! Now they are "a compound with climate-controlled facilities." World class spin, Larry.'

Privatize zoo, councillors urged

Don Peat
City Hall Bureau

The elephants are lucky they’re leaving.

A review of the city’s core services suggests selling the Toronto Zoo.

It’s the latest city asset KPMG recommends the city wash its hands of.

Mayor Rob Ford dodged a question Wednesday about whether he’d sell it.

“This is about priorities and what we can afford,” Ford said when asked directly about the suggested zoo selloff.

At its meeting Thursday, the parks and environment committee will consider pulling the city out of the business of running the Riverdale Farm, the High Park zoo and the Far Enough Farm on Toronto Island.

Councillors on the executive committee will have to mull selling off the Toronto Zoo, too, at next Thursday’s meeting.

Selling the zoo would yield $3.5 million in net savings, according to a confidential document viewed by the Sun.

The zoo won’t be the only city facility that could be up for sale.

Consultants also recommend councillors consider selling one or more of the city’s theatres, specifically the Toronto Centre for the Arts.

Weeks before the Canadian National Exhibition starts, the report recommends councillors think about making the CNE independent from the city.

FINANCIAL JUNGLE

- Sell the zoo to private owners.

- Partner or give the zoo to the federal government or other governments.

- Create a non-profit entity to run and operate the zoo.

- Integrate finance, infrastructure management and administration services with the city.


KPMG study urges Toronto City councillors to privatize zoo:

uly 21, 2011
KPMG report advocated selling the Toronto Zoo, Exhibition Place and city-owned theatres.
At its meeting Thursday, the parks and environment committee will consider pulling the city out of the business of running the Riverdale Farm, the High Park zoo and the Far Enough Farm on Toronto Island.
Councillors on the executive committee will have to mull selling off the Toronto Zoo too.
Selling the zoo would yield $3.5 million in net savings, according to a confidential document viewed by the Sun.
Options being considered:
- Sell the zoo to private owners.
- Partner or give the zoo to the federal government or other governments.
- Create a non-profit entity to run and operate the zoo.
- Integrate finance, infrastructure management and administration services with the city.

Suggestions by commenters:

City of Toronto - Toronto Zoo
CRAWSHAW GRAHAM Senior Veterinarian KEEP THIS GUY $117,675.18
DUNCAN CHARLES Manager, Computer & Telecommunication Services $105,650.53
EVANS PETER Chief Executive Officer $109,166.32
GUNTON SUSAN Director - Planning & Analysis $128,574.22
HALE ROBIN Chief Operating Officer $180,358.14
MORRIS ERIC Director - Facilities & Services $109,973.53
RAPLEY WILLIAM Exec Director - Conservation, Education & Research $146,863.43
SHALAPATA CURTIS Manager, Human Resources $101,542.97
WHITE CALVIN CEO - partial stand-in salary-usually more $289,321.44
WHITTAM PAUL K. Manager - Financial Services $110,208.76
YOUNG SHANNA Executive Director - Marketing & Communications $149,212.49

$28.00 for admission (including parking)
1.3 M people visit the Zoo each year.
If the City will only net 3.5 M in savings, put ticket prices up by $3 to break even.

Additional thoughts from a private email:

Just on the shortlist of salaries above, they should keep the vet... and got rid of the rest who are just useless paper-pushers. With 1 manager for every 3 workers, there's plenty more to cut that isn't shown here, so it could easily be turned into a money-maker by the right owners. Most of the real animal people are long gone though.

I'm sure developers or other government controlled factions would love to get their mitts on that 710 acres. Animals will be the last thing on their minds. This is just a political game that rears it's head occasionally.

My thoughts:

When the Senior Veterinarian is one of the lowest salaried individual's at a zoological faculty, surpassed by, for example a Marketing and Communications Director it looks like this thing has been a monkey f*ck for a long time. Ax the "human resources" bs and ask the simple question, "who want's to shovel shit, and who doesn't." To quote John Milton, "case closed."

Early Toronto Zoo Contruction





Toronto Zoo's Pavilions

Toronto Zoo hypar pavilion roof

The Africa and Indo-Malayan Pavilions of the Toronto Zoo.
Numbers in brackets represent straight edge length in feet; numbers at corners represents elevation in feet.

Drawings of multi-leaf shell structures using interconnecting hyperbolic paraboloids of latticed tubular members

Drawings of multi-leaf shell structures using interconnecting hyperbolic paraboloids of latticed tubular members

Drawings of multi-leaf shell structures using interconnecting hyperbolic paraboloids of latticed tubular members


It is hard to fathom that a faculty that was touted as "the wave of the future/cutting edge/state of the art etc. etc." could get it's self into it's current jackpot. What an exciting en-devour when first constructed and opened to the public. Even had a massive mono rail(Canadian Domain) in addition to the climate controlled zoo geographic pavilions. Like many big city zoo's I just think there were too many hand's in the pot, with too many "opinions" for it to succeed at it's initial level and expectations.

Monday, August 1, 2011

20th century French lithograph of circus horses. Published by Leon Beyaert-Sioen.

Ringling Bros. Circus--1943

Cole Bros. Circus--1949

Mlle Charmette--1950's

I wonder why they left the typo "his" unchanged, especially on what appears to be a publicity photo?

Cole Bros.--1941

Bailey Bros. Circus--1945

Tanglefoot and Heidi Herriott

website John Milton, have you see this ?

Maurice and Nadia Houcke

Maurice Houcke Circus Krone 1962

Bertram Mills Circus Liberty Horses presented by Nadia Houcke

Carl Sembach--1962

Crystal Sembach-Krone


The Circus "NO SPIN ZONE": What is stress and what is acceptable ...




1967


Historically Krone has had some of the most beautiful horse harness in all of show business.

1910

Unknown European Circus--1931

Ringling Bros. Sarasota Winter Quarters--1930's

Lillian Burlsem



Unknown

Does anyone know what a "cock robin" is?

Paul & Ruth Nelson--Cole Bros. 1944





Sunday, July 31, 2011

Environment: The case against protection


So why not leave you with perhaps the biggest question in the environmental book - where is the natural world heading, if nothing much changes?

Simply protecting land and sea won't be enough to stem the loss of nature, according to a study just out in the Marine Ecology Progress series.

Read it one way, and it's one of the most depressing things you'll have seen, if you're concerned about the biosphere's future.

Currently, about 13% of the world's land surface is under some form of protection, about half of which is under what a recent study evaluated as "strict" protection.

At sea, it's a different story, with protection hovering around the 1% level - depending on how you define it.

So if land protection is in one sense a success story, being a rare example of an internationally agreed target that has been met and indeed exceeded, what impact is it having on biodiversity loss?

The various graphs in the paper, some of which I've copied in here, tell the story better than any of its words.

Graph Even as protected areas expand, indices of biodiversity such as the Living Planet index decline

In region after region, the line indicating protection tracks upwards, even as measures of biodiversity point the other way.

So is there any point in protecting habitat?

When I called up one of the authors, Camilo Mora from the University of Hawaii, he was at pains to point out that an end to protection was not on his agenda.

"Protection is necessary - but far from sufficient," seems to be the overall message.

"We're definitely not saying we shouldn't protect areas - the problem is that we're investing all our human capital into those areas," he told me.

"We're putting all our eggs in one basket, which is dangerous; but even more dangerous is that there's a hole in the bottom of the basket."

The force they flag up as driving the world's biological diversity to the edge and perhaps beyond is, simply, that we are consuming too much.

That won't be a revolutionary message to some.

But the authors believe it's something that many more policymakers and ordinary citizens have to put at the centre of their thinking if the sixth great extinction is not to exceed the five previous ones in scale and rate.

Another of the authors, Peter Sale from the Canadian Institute for Water, Health and the Environment, put it like this:

"We are just taking too much - managing forests in such as way as they degrade, same with coastal waters, and we have to stop doing this as a species.

"I don't have a solution - I have struggled for some time trying to think what is the way to get people to realise how important this is - but if we don't find it soon, the future is a very grim one.

"We're talking about losing 50% of species in the next half century - that's faster than any previous mass extinction event - and anybody who thinks we can go through a mass extinction and be perfectly fine is just deluding themselves."

Bag shop Cutting consumption does not appear on the agenda of most governments

There's some implied criticism for mainstream conservation groups here.

The authors suggest these groups concentrate too much on protected areas, and ignore the issue of over-consumption.

In my own experience, that's not entirely correct.

It's more that conservation, being an element of the political process, is in large part the art of the possible.

And while getting governments to set areas aside for tigers or sharks is doable, there are few ready to lend an ear to the politically suicidal idea of reducing their citizens' consumption.

It's also controversial inside the wide umbrella of civil society.

Organisations such as Oxfam, for example, which campaign on climate change, are there in large part to advance the cause of the global poor - and that doesn't mean reducing their consumption of food or fuel.

Changing the nature of what we consume is seen in some quarters as more feasible - eating locally-produced food, powering society with renewables rather than fossil fuels - but so far, it's making merely a dent in the overall upwards trend of us guzzling more and more stuff.

And this is only augmented by the growth of the world's human population, set to top seven billion before the end of the year.

As with domestic politics, attempts to get sustainable consumption onto the international agenda have thus far been an almost total failure.

The next big set-piece chance to discuss it is the Rio+20 summit next May.

The issue has been mentioned and discussed by governments in the preparatory process, and there are nods to it in some of the outline documents.

For example: "...certain types of consumption and investment must be restricted to avoid excessive resource depletion and waste, whereas environmentally-friendly investment and consumption should expand..."

But you would have to ask how urgent, how quantified, how serious this really sounds...

...especially when you set it alongside one of the papers cited in the new Sale and Mora paper - that by 2050, the human race will be consuming so much of nature's resources than in order for this to come at a sustainable rate, we would need to be drawing on the resources of 27 Earths.

Vintage Atlanta Zoo


The Circus "NO SPIN ZONE": Vintage Zoo Atlanta/Grant Park

The Circus "NO SPIN ZONE": Vintage Zoo Atlanta/Grant Park