Sunday, February 6, 2011

Elephant training starts anew after founder's firing.


Before founding The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee, Buckley operated her own elephant management company, Tarra Productions, performing throughout the US, Canada and abroad in a number of circuses, including Circus Gatini in Quebec, Canada, and the Big Apple Circus in New York City.

She has worked and consulted with zoos, including African Lion Safari and Bowmanville Zoo in Ontario, Canada; the Racine Zoo in Wisconsin; and the Chehaw Wild Animal Park in Albany, Georgia. She has also created and managed elephant programs for Marriott’s Great America Theme Park, Knott’s Berry Farm Theme Park, Santa Barbara Zoo, Kansas City Zoo, Nashville Zoo and Granby Zoo.

Elephant Aid International : One World...One Elephant at a Time


Marnie was 3 years old. She learned to pick up her left foot on command, but became confused when being trained to lift the right. The sharp metal hook dug into the back of her wrist, causing her to trip and fall to her elbows. Her mind raced, her fear rose and she wanted to run away, but the metal hook was suddenly embedded in her jaw. She could not escape! Scrambling to her feet, she felt the hook pierce the tender flesh of her ankle again. In an effort to escape the pain, she lifted both front feet from the ground at the same time, pulling them from the reach of the hook. The trainer marveled at his own genius.

The phrase ‘wild animal training’ conjures images of dancing bears, snarling lions, costumed elephants walking on their hind legs, and killer whales performing in aquatic parks, circuses and zoos worldwide. Regardless of what training methods are used, wild animals have traditionally been trained for human entertainment.

Wild animal training has evolved over the past 2 decades, incorporating more humane methods. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of elephant trainers have adopted them.
Breaking tradition is difficult in any culture. Changing the training methodology and deeply ingrained practices that have grown around elephant training and management poses a challenge that many are unable, or unwilling, to embrace. Thus, very many trainers cling to familiar, if antiquated, practices of control that employ pain, intimidation and deprivation.
Elephant training: 2 systems
Elephant training systems are divided into 2 categories: dominance and non-dominance. Elephants respond to both systems, but the impact the 2 systems have on their psyche and well-being is quite different.
Elephant management practices in Asia vary slightly from region to region and country to country, but there is one common element: the use of dominance in capturing, training and managing the elephants.
Making the transition from dominance-based training to non-dominance is not difficult. Even an elephant who has known only dominance management can transition from dominance to non-dominance effortlessly when given the opportunity. Once an elephant receives a reward from the trainer for co-operating during training, he/she immediately comprehends the concept.

Dominance training: autonomy lost
Mimicking his supervisor, an apprentice trainer bellows a command as he strikes the elephant across the leg with the heavy handle of his bullhook. The elephant squeals in fear as she recoils from him. She wants to co-operate, but never seems to move fast enough to appease her trainer. Resigned to the futility of her efforts, she gives up, stops responding to his commands and mindlessly accepts his brutality.

Dominance training is the traditional method widely used with elephants held in captivity. In this system, the trainer uses force, pain and deprivation to gain dominance and control. Elephants quickly learn that co-operation and obedience are required for their survival.

They lose their autonomy and come to understand that their entire existence is dependent on the trainer, who provides food, water, shelter and companionship. Dominance training causes elephants to live most of their lives ‘on guard’, waiting for instruction from the trainer, with little undistracted time to themselves. Obedience makes their existence livable, but only marginally so.

Non-dominance training: freedom to choose
Although Chang Yim is only 17 months old, it took only a short 10 minute training session for him to learn to place his foot against a target when asked. (The target is a flexible pole with a ‘spongy’ end). Now, when he hears the word “caw” (foot), he quickly touches the target with his foot and receives praise and a piece of banana. It is an easy exercise for such an intelligent pachyderm mind. After only 1 week of twice-daily training sessions, Chang Yim responds to requests for his forehead, front feet, back feet, ear flap and hip, always touching the appropriate body part to the target voluntarily.

Non-dominance training, which has become more accepted over the past 15 years, is based on learning theory and uses positive reinforcement. It provides elephants with autonomy and the freedom to make their own choices, allowing them to flourish.
Elephants quickly learn that there is no punishment or discipline in non-dominance training. As a result, they relax and engage in the process. They are able to concentrate more intensely than when being dominated, because they are not fearful or resistant.

The target: a focal point
Non-dominance training starts with the target used to shape behaviors, a whistle and a reward. The purpose of the target is to create a focal point, a benign object for the elephant to focus on. Initially the trainer gently touches a part of the elephant’s body with the target. Then the whistle blows, and a reward -- something tasty like a piece of banana – is given. The elephant quickly connects the whistle with the touch and, of course, the reward. Throughout the training, the target touches different parts of the elephant’s body -- foot, ear, head, leg and side -- following the same process, giving each body part a name.
The elephant quickly learns the terminology, voluntarily placing the requested body part against the target. An elephant is never told “no”, and can never fail. Elephants participate freely in the training, making their own decision whether or not they wish to participate. If at any point the elephant chooses not to participate, he or she simply walks away without any reprimanded. Allowing elephants to choose without punishment helps boost their self-confidence and willingness to engage in the training. Done properly, the training becomes a much-anticipated activity.

Non-dominance training acknowledges, respects, and takes advantage of elephant intelligence. Trainers schooled in dominance training often have difficulty embracing the concept of elephants having autonomy and freedom of choice, 2 essential components of the non-dominance system. But if the trainer grasps the concept and masters non-dominance techniques, his/her perspective often changes to respect and admiration.

Elephant training culture worldwide is experiencing a shift. Asia has yet to embrace non-dominance management due to lack of exposure. As efforts to teach non-dominance techniques reach more mahouts, they will see the positive results as their jobs - and the lives of their elephants - improve.
__________________________________

"Target training is useless for anything other then a protected contact situation. Even in a protected contact situation it is only about 90% effective, if you have unlimited time and are asking for limited responses." But if you are tired of riding your horse, or lunging him, or otherwise looking for something different and fun, teaching him to touch the target and receive a reward may be just the ticket. Horse whisper's are realizing a new cash windfall teaching target training, liberty playing, and various other natural gadgets, gizmo's, and do dad's. Spend, spend, but more importantly, have fun with the new "natural" method. Fun is all it accomplishes.

9 comments:

Jim A. said...

Remember the "real professional trainer" discussion a few weeks ago? OK, I would suggest that there are some that can get reliable results delivering the stimulus with an ankus or a target when handled properly. I've worked with elephants with an ankus and don't apologize for it. I understand an ankus is not a subsitute for a spear or baseball bat nor, by itself, it has no Hindu mystic power. It's also not going to stop an elephant from running off, etc. if they're really going to go. If an ankus is a method to present the stimulus why not a target? I'm suggesting a competent trainer might be able to work with elephants hands-on, delivering the stimulus in a different way. We just have to find a competent, "real professional" trainer who believes a target might work. Is that Carol Buckley? Probably not -- good talker but I haven't seen any great training from her yet. I'll also admit that I don't think target training will work on all elephants; ankus training doesn't make every elephant reliable either. Somebody,somewhere, probably in a zoo or park, is going to train a good act with a target. It could work with a real professional trainer. I hope one day I'll see it.

In the mean time, working an elephant with an ankus is fine with me. In trained hands, it's a method to deliver a stimulus and not a weapon (don't get all excited and say I'm anti-circus).

Darryl said...

This sounds an awful lot like putting your children in time out without the time out. LOL So how has this method worked out for the youth of america? So i guess if the elephant runs away, do you chase it with the target and a reward or do you just wait for it to feel like returning. Marine mammals are target trained and they just swim away if they dont feel like doing the show. How could this work for elephants not contained!

Jim A. said...

Hold on there Darryl, could there be more than one way? Did I say you had to trained animals on an open parking lot? Have marine mammals ever refused to perform, yes, it's happen to me. Usually it had to do with seasonal breeding behavior. How about male elephants in musth, not too reliable either. There's a lot more to target training than just pitching treats to an animal in hope that it will do what you wish. I know your an experienced trainer with a lot more elephant and cat experience than me. You might have some marine mammal experience like I have some elephant experience. I probably have a little more positive reinforcement or target training experience. Doesn't make me better, we've just done different things in life. As I mentioned, I have trained young elephants using traditional methods (I have witnesses). It works (they worked) and I don't think I was a brute. I'm only suggesting there might be a different approach to training -- not better, just different. One day someone will give it a try. At my age (69) I seen countless products and processes that I thought would never happen. I don't understand a lot of it and it may not interest me but I've learned to never say never.

Darryl said...

i agree Jim. I have never trained marine mammals and bow to your experience there. I'm just asking questions. I do believe in never say never. I have seen primates target trained.

Jim A. said...

No bow necessary Darryl, I'm just suggesting a different recipe. There's a lot of BS out there about positive reinforcement training. It sounds so cuddly, warm, and fuzzy. Some say they're using it but they're just offering treats. Good positive reinforcement training is serious, thoughful business. How do you set up for success and when do you or don't you give reinforcement. Most good traditional trainers have used it's basics without knowing they've been using it.

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

I missed this discussion. Mr. Alexander, I have seen lots of PC elephants work very mediocre. I have seen a few that worked pretty sharp. The sharp elephants all had one thing in common, and that was fear of stimulus to go with their food drive. I am not at all saying it wouldn't be possible to get great results with out that fear. I just don't think food will be a strong enough motivator in elephants as it is with birds and marine mammals. I even know of some tigers in a zoo that were target trained in a PC enclosure, the tigers work get in optimum conditions, but they need very little to stress them and just go lay down somewhere till the trainer goes away. I also bow to your years experience with animals, and this comment is with all due respect.

Wade G. Burck said...

Casey,
What the hell kind of suck up is, "also bow to your years experience with animals, and this comment is with all due respect?" We know you, your not fooling anybody with that.
Wade

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

Not a suck up, so much as I don't want Mr. Alexander thinking I have been around the block as much as he.

Also though, after more thought, the problem with strictly target training and operant conditioning with elephants, is that even when it works, it only works in context training. Just like marine mammals in a tank, and tigers in an arena, the elephant can't really go anywhere, so has to participate to a degree. Unlike classically trained elephants that can be taken out of their "optimum" environment and worked with out the aid of a barrier. To try to work an elephant, with out tactile stimulus as an option, and the elephant having always "volunteered" its behaviors, would be a dangerous proposition. Maybe not impossible, but very implausible.

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

All that said, I am becoming a bigger fan of PC programs for zoos. I visited a few this winter and I think it eliminates a lot of potential danger to inexperienced keepers. The elephants were still well cared for physically. And I think the zoos all made it look like the elephants got plenty of mental stimulation. I am not sure what they called "enrichment" actually "enriched" the mental well being of the animals, but a lot had breeding programs that I would venture DID enrich mental health. All and all it is easy to see why so many zoos have gone to PC management of elephants. They are not asking the elephants to load up and go down the road performing, so why not eliminate the risks taken to do such things?

I am curious to know Mr. Alexanders opinion on PC programs at zoos.