The traditional description of piaffe as done at the School would be something like this: "A cadenced trot on the spot with the shortest moment of suspension; the forearms [the upper forelegs from the elbows to the knees] are nearly horizontal and the toe of the hind hoof that is off the ground comes to or slightly above the coronet band of the other hind hoof." (This description is based on text and photos in Podhajsky's "Complete Training of Horse and Rider")
To establish piaffe on the spot, piaffe is practiced between the pillars at the School. The pillars are posts set in the ground a little less than 1.5 meters apart. They have four rings at various heights up to 1.75 meters (a little less than 5' 9") to attach pillar reins (similar to cross ties). For this exercise, the stallion wears a cavesson and side reins as he does for in hand work. According to Podhajsky, the horse is prepared for this work by walking between the pillars, standing between the pillars, and then asking for piaffe with his shoulders between the pillars while two assistants hold the horse by lead reins attached to the side rings of the cavesson. When the stallion is comfortable with this procedure, he is attached to the two pillars rather than two humans and asked for piaffe. This work is sometimes also done with a rider in the saddle.
What about the passage? The classical and competition definitions are closer than for piaffe but there are still some apparent differences. The classical passage has been described as a cadenced trot with a longer period of suspension and the airborne legs higher than in the trot "floating above the ground" as if "borne on invisible wings"; a "collected trot in slow motion." [Quotations are from Podhajsky's "Complete Training of Horse and Rider"This is one of the great books I have in my personal library, Warren. Like any "tool" for training whether it be a whip, stick, elephant hook, spurs, bit, pillars etc. etc. the complete understanding of them and knowledge of their use makes them a wonderful training aid. Without that understanding and knowledge they will become a tool of abuse and/or physical harm. In the historical forms of animal training, (the Riding Academy's, Falconry etc., even bull fighting which requires you to understand the physiology and movement of a bulls mind and body ) there is a time honored apprenticeship/learning period before you are ever allowed to work with an animal or practice the craft. It is something that was in place historically in the Circus animal training field many, many years ago, that has been lost or ignored in a rush to just do anything to fill the ring. It is why many of the "tools' of the circus animal training field are not only misunderstood but used in the wrong way. Give me a hammer and I will break something or hurt someone with it. If some body buys a gun, Warren that does not make them a marksman. By studying the use of a pillar and understanding it's purpose, I was able to teach a tiger to corbette over two tigers, by using my body and two whips instead of 3 people.
3 comments:
Hi Wade,
I came across this book on Amazon once again, and I thought it might be right up your alley. It is written by Phillipe Karl, formerly of the Cadre Noir in France. He tells it like it is and is quick to debate anyone who does not see the light. He has had heated discussions with other French trainers, especially Michel Henriquet, when it comes to classical dressage principles. Here is some info lifted from Amazon.com. Below the description is a link to a letter that Karl wrote as a reply to one of Henriquet's articles--it is very enlightening and I think you would thoroughly enjoy it, especially the ending!
"Product Description
One of the most outspoken critics of the modern dressage world reveals some disturbing facts about the physical, anatomical, and mental effects through official dressage guidelines as issued by the German Horse Society (FN) on horses. By comparing these with philosophies of masters of classical riding such as La Gueriniere and Baucher, he shows possible solutions to the challenging situation of modern competitive dressage. After describing the effects of modern dressage, breeding, and business, the author suggests a classical alternative—the philosophy of "legerity."
About the Author:
Philippe Karl is a breeder and rider, and former member of the Cadre Noir, the French elite riding school in Saumur. His other titles include Long Reining."
http://www.philippe-karl.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5&location_id=354&topicid=3
Chris,
LOL. It is indeed a small world. I have that book, and I am currently enjoying and learning from LONG REINING THE SAUMUR METHOD, by Philippe Karl. I posted a few pictures a while back from the book as examples of a perfect collected piaffe. I have said in the past, I have learned more about tiger and elephant training from reading and studying the riding master, then I ever did from a Clyde Beatty/Gunther Gebel Williams book. These gentlemen understand the "mechanics" of an animal, as they had to earn the diploma, it was not born to them, and has nothing to do with "cute and charming." They studied it and were graded by those more knowledgeable then them.
I will try to get a couple of more pictures scanned from the LONG REINING book. The pictures showing the transition from collection to piaffe, to passage, back to piaffe, in to pesade are particularly brilliant, and "picture perfect."
Yes, Phillipe Karl is one of the experts that I prefer to surround myself with.
Wade
Thank you for a very concise and informative answer to my questions. I have a much clearer picture now of the process and also appreciate the clarification of the differences between passage and piaffe. I'll definatelly be paying much closser attention the next opportunity I have to see classic equine work up close - hopefully not a long time away. I really have enjoyed the current crop of photos and the accompanying lessons in the equestrian arts from all who post here.
I appreciate your patience with me and my questions that you probably find tiresome and ignorant but I was taught that the only stupid question is the one you don't ask and I have access here to some real experts to ask.
Warren
Post a Comment