Friday, December 19, 2008

The Best Cage Act Historian in Europe

People ask me who I think will be the Best Cage Act Historian in Europe someday. I have a good idea who it will be, but people might disagree. So I have a formula here that should answer that question without any doubt. Try it out.

1) Pick your favorite number between 1-9

2) multiply by 3, then

3) add 3, then again multiply by 3

4) you'll get a 2 or 3 digit number

5) Add the digits together

Now with that number see who will be "The Best Cage Act Historian in Europe" from the list below:

1. Lisa
2. Guidoos
3. Ron Mikkenic
4. Hills
5. Dieren trainer Jr.
6. Alexander
7. Kevin
8. Martijn H
9. Thomas Bonner
10. Hans-Jurgen Tiede

17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wade, I started with 5, so I ended with 9, Thomas Bonner. Would you please fix your widget so that I can follow threads? Thank you.
Mary Ann

Wade G. Burck said...

Mary Ann,
Don't get hot at me!!!! The same thing is going on at the "history channel". I emailed my technical consultant this morning, because I am a putz and he apparently doesn't give a damn or is busy eating at the Waffle House with my son. What the hell do you want from me. LOL
Wade

Anonymous said...

Mary Ann - what is a widget and why does Wade's need fixing?

Anonymous said...

Steve, I was not referring to Wade's private parts, but to the list of recent comments at the right.
Mary Ann

Anonymous said...

Wade, actually it will always be 9:
(3x + 3)3 = 9x + 9 = 9(x+1)
Any number divisible by nine will always have its digits add up to 9.
Mary Ann

Anonymous said...

Thomas Bonner? What does ths mean mr Burck?

Wade G. Burck said...

Casey,
Forget the email. I am going to be able to have sex again. Mary Ann was talking about the recent comments.
Wade

Wade G. Burck said...

Dan the Booker,
It means that Thomas Bonner is the Best Cage Act Historian in Europe. Princess Steffie mentioned it to me. It is the same system judges use at MC for picking best 0 the best.
Wade

Anonymous said...

Wade, if x is the number selected, then the formula for the procedure described is (3x + 3)3, which simplifies to 9x + 9. Then factoring this expression yields 9(x+1), which is divisible by 9. The digits of any number that is divisible by 9 always add up to 9.
Mary Ann

Anonymous said...

Thank you Mary Ann. Your explanation was what I needed.

Mr Burck's private parts were the last thing on my mind!! LOL

Anonymous said...

No doubt about it - -its Tiede and not only in Europe

Wade G. Burck said...

RJR,
Not according to the Monte Carlo Quantum it isn't. What makes you say that. Is history not also about fact? I don't thing compiling a lot of old things makes you a Historian, unless they are cataloged with facts.
Wade

Raffaele De Ritis said...

I agree with Mr.Reynolds about Thiede's possible leadership over that matter. But everybody here is forgetting Christian Hamel, that is a serious competitor on the subject...

Anonymous said...

Thanks Wade,
I always win :) LOL

Thomas

Wade G. Burck said...

Raffaele,
I have heard of Christian Hamel but have never seen his work or met him. If you should run into him, give him my email. I would like to speak with him further.
Again, if it is going to be history, accuracy is of paramount importance. I was shown a Thiede book a few years ago, and while the pictures were fabulous, the bios were incredibly inaccurate. I suggest he can be influenced by who is telling him the tail, and a historian must be as brutally impartial as a researcher. They said, "look here is your picture", and your bio. I thought that is odd as I had never heard of Thiede, or spoken to him. Paging through, there were many bios of inaccuracy. Self serving fluff, but not much of historical value. I can't speak to the early years, but from the mid 70's on, you can sure tell who he personally talked with, shared a popcorn with, and who he didn't.
Wade

Anonymous said...

A mathematical certainty that you'll finish on a particular number. In my less than humble opinion, you'll be one short!

Wade G. Burck said...

John,
Your opinion is surly not humble, who would be missing?
Wade