Saturday, February 13, 2010

Toledo Zoo takes in elephant confiscated from Indiana circus

t didn't take long for the Toledo Zoo's newest addition to make herself at home.

Twiggy, a 25-year-old African elephant, arrived at the zoo late Thursday after being confiscated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture from a private circus owner near Peru, Ind.
Now, she's getting comfortable in the just-completed "bachelor pad" that the zoo created for 6-year-old Louie.
"Louie's facility has a stall with a concrete floor to bathe him and a huge stall with a sand floor," said Anne Baker, the zoo's executive director. "She seems to really like the sand floor. Within minutes of coming off the truck she was kicking up the dust, taking a sand bath."
Twiggy is being quarantined in the bull facility, a prelude to her being introduced to the zoo's two other resident elephants, Louie and his mother, 29-year-old Renee.
Ms. Baker could not say how long it would be before the public will get to meet Twiggy, who at 5,500 to 5,600 pounds is "thin." The new elephant also has pitted feet, indicating she's been subjected to rough surfaces and didn't receive proper foot care, Ms. Baker said.

"I think what may be for me the most alarming is she has some pretty significant stereotypic behaviors," said Ms. Baker, whose background is in animal behavior. "She does a lot of head swinging, back and forth in a very repetitive manner. She also has a habit of lifting up her one leg very, very high just repeatedly."

Head-swinging often indicates an animal has not had appropriate stimulation, she explained, and has been kept by itself with little to do.
"Elephants are highly sociable," Ms. Baker said. "They like being around other animals."
USDA spokesman Dave Sacks said the agency's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service routinely visits and inspects zoos, circuses, and other facilities with animals protected by the Animal Welfare Act. He said it's "highly unusual" to confiscate a large animal. Inspectors must determine that an animal is suffering, he said.
"With the elephant, it was health-related. She just wasn't doing well," Mr. Sacks said. "She had been losing weight. There were some skin issues."
Ms. Baker said the USDA approached the zoo about two weeks ago about the possibility of taking Twiggy. Most of the Toledo Zoo's large animals come from other zoos rather than from rescue situations, she said.
"We very quickly chatted among our staff ... and we felt it was not only something we could do, but something we should do," Ms. Baker said.
Twiggy's transfer to Toledo has not come without criticism.
Julius von Uhl, the elephant's previous owner, said he rescued Twiggy 15 years ago and trained her to perform in his traveling circus.
He said USDA inspectors were at his home three times last year and never informed him of any problems with his elephant, who lived in his barn.
Mr. von Uhl claimed his elephant was stolen from him just as he had made plans to retire and sell Twiggy to the Pittsburgh Zoo.
Tracy Gray, a spokesman for the Pittsburgh Zoo, confirmed that zoo officials had spoken with Mr. von Uhl about the elephant but said no agreement was in place.
"We were just in discussions with him, and we had nothing concrete," she said.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals also chimed in on the issue, saying the USDA had transferred Twiggy "from one bad situation to another" by moving her to the Toledo Zoo. PETA accused the zoo of using "an outdated, circus-style form of elephant management" - a claim Ms. Baker disputed.
"Do we use a guide? Yes, we do, but do we use it inappropriately? No," Ms. Baker said, adding that PETA does not want to see elephants in zoos nor does it want zoos to exist at all.
"We certainly expected to hear this from PETA, because this is what they say," she said.
"They will say this about every zoo in the country. That's their mantra. Our mantra is, we want to do the very best possible for the animals, and I think we do that."

27 comments:

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

This is starting to look a little fishy. Elephants being taken away and given to "for-profit" zoos, with no reimbursement to the owner. I am not arguing that the elephant should have stayed where it was, but rather, why did it go where it went? Starting to seem as though the USDA elephant task leader may be making back room deals with zoos that need elephants.

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

I have no evidence of this, just saying it is very coincidental. San Diego needed elephants, Davenport elephants are there now. Another zoo, that wanted to buy the last Davenport elephant prior to them being shut down, now saying they can't "buy" her, but would accept a donation of her. Now this with Von Uhl. Look for the Dallas Zoo to accept some soon, seeing they just blew 27 million dollars on an exhibit, that needs a few more to fill it.

Anonymous said...

The San Diego Zoo already had 7 elephants before they got Tina and Jewel. They hardly NEEDED more.

By the way, why should a zoo spend 100.000 + Dollars on an old/sickly elephant that makes a poor exhibit due to lots of stereotypic behavoir?

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

Anonymous,
Have you ever seen Boo??? Poor old sickly are the last words I would use to describe her...LOL If she were, as you say, "old/sickly" why did she not get confiscated with the other two? That is the hypocrisy of it,,, he wasn't taking care of two elephants and action needed to take place immediately, but some how they assume he was WAS taking care of the other. Does no one see how ridiculous that looks?!?! I have spent a lot of time around Boo and I never saw behavior that would make her a "poor" exhibit. While we are at it Genius...and I use the term loosely... Describe for the class "stereotypic behavior" please, we would all love to hear it. While you are at it, explain "who" gets to decide the elephants are getting a better quality of life where they are ending up then where they were. That person must really really really know something about animals, and I would love to meet them.



I am in no way defending the people described here, I just find it suspicious the way these confiscations are playing out. Not trying to push the blame in the direction of a zoo, I love zoos, but how much worse was Von Uhl was doing with his 1 elephant, then a breeding program breeding 14 elephants only to die from a disease the program knew was very likely to kill them at a very early age. Were those 14 not accountable, but the one life of Twiggy is precious enough we need to waste all this time and effort?? Where in the hell are the Elephant sanct brigades??? Has the economy brought fund raising to such a halt they don't "offer" sanctuary to elephants any more??

Bob Cline said...

Lots of comments and articles about Twiggy. Indeed it all sounds very suspicious. However, I haven't seen anything about what happened to the ten lions and tigers that were seized also. Anyone heard anything about them?
Bob

Rick West said...

Mr. Cline, here is a link with more information regarding the cats that were seized.

http://pjboosinger.viviti.com/

(Feb. 13th link)

Anonymous said...

I tend to agree with Casey on this one! There was a sale about to happen and suddenly out of the clear blue sky comes a confiscation.
Someone in the USDA is working overtime!
Where did Von Uhl's cats go?

Anonymous said...

Miami Metro zoo is calling to all private owners to bring in their animals! Something wrong here!something VERY wrong here!

Steve said...

Rick, I think that you will find that these are different cats from another seizure.

Bob Cline said...

The link posted is about Barbara Hoffman's animals being confiscated in Texas. Some of those but not all were taken to a "Sanctuary" outside of baraboo, WI. where just conincidentally, the male and female white tiger and the male and female black leopards are now housed together for those "Accidental" pregnancies. This sanctuary was almost closed two years ago and had like $23,000 worth of USDA fines then.
Now tell me, how were these animals being helped?

Still no word on Von Uhl's cats.

Anonymous said...

It's crazy to be suspicious of the zoos! Sure they are in business to make a profit, but no one in the zoo world is getting rich. Their profits are almost entirely returned back into making the zoo better -- for both the animals and visitors.

Go figure, though, that the great Toledo Zoo steps forward and provides a good home for this elephant -- and silly PETA still criticizes them.

Allen Nyhuis, Coauthor: America's Best Zoos

Wade G. Burck said...

Allen,
I agree with you. But the folks in this business, need to have something to point a finger at. Historically, if you look, that has always been the case.

Anonymous Mutt,
What is wrong with Miami offering that assistance. The President's "junker" offer was just that, an offer.
Wade

Wade G. Burck said...

Amonymous Mutt and Casey,
The sale of the elephant was "in the talking stages". That means nothing. I am in the horse business, and 90% of the sales are just that, talk. In the talking stages is sure not a signed, deposited check.
Wade

john herriott said...

I saw this elephant perform at the Circus Hall of Fame in Peru and other places. It was obviously a basic trained animal that could be hands on handled. So it would certainly be salable to zoos, etc. I believe Baron should have been allowed to continue with his efforts to sell it. Over the nyearshe has spent time and money in keeping it and he is entitled to compensation. The Toledo zoo should pay him the going rate for a hands on African elephant of a young adult age. How much did Buckles or Terry Frisco get for just such a sale. Undoubtably over the years USDA did not raise much of a fuss about the animal until just recent.

Anonymous said...

I saw this elephant perform at the Circus Hall of Fame in Peru and other places. It was obviously a basic trained animal that could be hands on handled. So it would certainly be salable to zoos, etc. I believe Baron should have been allowed to continue with his efforts to sell it. Over the nyearshe has spent time and money in keeping it and he is entitled to compensation. The Toledo zoo should pay him the going rate for a hands on African elephant of a young adult age. How much did Buckles or Terry Frisco get for just such a sale. Undoubtably over the years USDA did not raise much of a fuss about the animal until just recent.

Anonymous said...

If the media reports are correct, this elephant is in serious trouble, weigthing just 5500-5600 pounds. That`s waaay too low for a 25 year old female african elephant and together with the skin and feet issues the USDA apparently found (again according to the press), that could indeed have required emergency actions by the USDA. No time to wait if a zoo may or rather may not pay 150.000 $$ for an underweight elephant.

But you do prefer clunging to conspiracy theories instead of admitting that not all private elephant owners are capable of caring for their animals, don`t you?

Nicole

Darryl said...

Amen Casey coincidence that both recent elephant seizures went to zoos with new elephant facilities to fill and to meet aza standards of a minimum of three elephants

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

I believe the elephant has been thin it's whole life. I don't think it had a "sudden" weight drop. I also don't believe the living conditions had changed for this elephant in the last 15 years. I have never seen the housing for this elephant, but if the barn passed a pre-license inspection, what changed so much that immediate action was needed to "save her? I am not arguing the elephant should have stayed there, I have no idea about its quality of life. I also would never doubt that there are private owners that should not own elephants. The same for some zoos. They should be judged individually though not as a group. Not sure who the "conspiracy" comment was directed, but hopefully not me. I am not suggesting that at all. I only question where and why the elephants are going where they are going. If that sounds conspiracy theory-ish so be it. Ask all the small dairies and ranchers that have been pushed out of business by governmental regulations supported by "big" beef and dairy lobbyists about conspiracy. The circus is chump change to the real game of government, I can't think they would waste their time with a conspiracy.

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

Nicole,
What IS the correct weight for a 25 year old African Elephant?
If you know that, then tell me the correct weight for a 6 year old female human too.

Darryl said...

From what i understand this elephant has lived in an old wood horse barn on four leg chains for years, so what has changed is how wildlife should be housed and this is a good thing. I have seen animals housed in bad conditions with no government violations at some facilities while others are persecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Why should everyone not have to meet the same standards

Anonymous said...

Just like a pre-permit health inspection for a restaurant, the place can fall apart and be infested with rats in 15 years and the restaurant won't be re-inspected until there is a complaint. Then they are issued warnings and given time to fix the issues. If that doesn't happen, their permits are revoked.
Do this crop of circus conspiracy theory cry-babies think that their industry is the only one that is required to follow regulations?
Every single friggin industry in the country, from plumbers to strip bars have regulations to follow, and for the most part, accept them without excessive whinning. Do these sad sacks think that they alone can operated any way they choose. How about this option : if you want to stay in business, get with the friggin program.....Jeez.

Anonymous said...

So, Casey, if an elephant needs to be re-housed, where do YOU propose they go? I doubt you'd think Tennessee would be an option, and evidently zoos, in your opinion, can't provide better care than this 72 year old and his shit filled barn. That's about it - snctuaries or zoos, or perhaps another trainer should have been given a crack at it? I'm sure you could find all sorts of not-for-profit circuses.

Anonymous said...

So, Darryl, on Buckles Blog your comment was that we must be lkiving in a communist country is anmals can be seized, yet you come back here and from what you understand this elephant was chained for years on 4 leg chains in an old horse barn. Is it that you don't believe that this warrents confiscation, or are you just playing to the old timers on the history channel?

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

Anonymous,
I would think TN or CA would be a much more acceptable place for the elephants honestly. At least they would be going some where under the guise of getting "sanctuary" I don't agree with either facilities beliefs, but there is a huge difference in giving a confiscated animal to a not for profit "sanctuary" and a FOR PROFIT ZOO. Maybe they could make a "don't exhibit to public" or "don't advertise NEW ELEPHANT" rule with these elephants they give to the zoos. An elephant sanctuary is something that should have been set up by circus people years ago, and never was. Now we are paying a price for that. I still don't know if this particular confiscation was right or wrong. There have been some in the past that I couldn't believe didn't happen sooner. I do not have a conspiracy theory. I do have a theory that there are a bunch of anonymous jags talking really tough judging other people here, with the safety blanket of knowing no one knows who is saying what. Cute, especially the part where you say all us whining sad sacks need to get with the frigging program,,,LOL. What program are you with "ANONYMOUS"? certainly we have a right to face our accuser. No...instead you will keep firing in shots from the shadows, thats fine. Another problem with the circus industry, if people had said the truth about situations years ago, and not hid in the shadows complaining cause they were scared, things maybe wouldn't be the way they are now.

Darryl said...

I have no problem with animals being taken if it is needed for the animals well being. I dont agree with government officials who havent a clue making that decision. This industry has never tried to police it's self and is now paying the price. How many knew about this animal and did nothing to resolve the problem from the industry.

Anonymous said...

Casey, my position does not allow me to be other than annymous, but I'll tell you this. There are others in the business who have nothing to do with animals who have sufferred greatly from all of this. When the traditional circus gets a black eye because of one single individual on the whole show, we all suffer. Yes, non animal performers and other employees have seen what's going on and helped perpetuate this by their silence, but they too have families to feed and winter bills to pay and for these 'selfish' reasons not 'sniched' in the hope that animal acts would clean up their operations.
I have seen your operation and am impressed with what you do and your obvious desire to usher in a new, more ethical generation of animal acts. But, I don't understand why your first response was to find something devious in the placement of this elephant.
I've seen similar comments when an elephant went to Buckley that somehow she was conspiring to steal everyone's elephants.
How about this for a senario: an animal needs to be removed - the USDA makes calls to see who has the approved facilities to take an elephant at a moment's notice (not an easy task, I imagine). Perhaps Toledo wasn't the first call they made. Perhaps zoos that need elephants are more likely to have empty slots and barn facilites for an extra elephant. So, perhaps the first thought shouldn't be "aha, isn't it funny that they needed an elephant and they got one" Perhaps the response should be "thank goodness there is still space somewhere that will take them"
As a funny aside, I got a Facebook request from a former performer who was concerned about the fate of Michael Jackson's giraffes. This same person had, herself ditched her animals at a 'sanctuary'. Maybe, not so funny after all.

Casey McCoy Cainan said...

Anonymous,
I think Buckley WAS trying to get all the elephants at one point. I don't think she is now (this economy has really slowed fund raising I am sure) But even so, elephants there in theory will spend the rest of their lives not be harassed or mistreated. I do disagree with their campaigning against ALL circus elephants, and their belief that Circus elephants cannot be treated humanely. Neither here nor there in this instance. I assume you read this blog regularly? Have you ever seen my chime in about a confiscation being wrong? Yet I still fail to see why this one took place the way it did. I believe Von Uhls problems with USDA were not elephant related but rather cat related. They won their case against him and confiscated the cats. GREAT. Then the next day suddenly the barn that was acceptable for 15 years is to small and the elephant looks "depressed" so he has one day to resolve the size of the barn?!?! I am not even going to touch how ridiculous it would be for an inspector to diagnose depression in an elephant. But one day seems kinda like a rush job. I still don't have enough facts on this particular case, but I am thinking we skipped DUE PROCESS on this one.