Saturday, April 19, 2008

Oh happy day---Patience is indeed a virtue.

On March 11, 2008, on Buckles Blog I asked a question in regards to the term "vertical" in horse training/riding terminology, in reference to a picture of William Heyer. Below is the question and John Herriotts response:

Wade G. Burck said...

Madame Col.,
Thank you for responding to the "question" of what is the specific name for this action. I didn't even "suggest", as I didn't have a clue. Hard to tell sometimes in a still photo, what a "movement" actually is. Using today's generally accepted standard of judging, would he be what's considered, on the vertical. For my own understanding and knowledge.
Thank you,
Wade Burck

johnny said...

Wade, Here we go again. Its obvious the horse is doing a fantastic "High Trot" [also called by the "horsey set a Spainish trot] Don't they wish they could do one. What the hell is Vertical, please enlighten me, and for your information its just "one hellava great high trot" and I don't believe we need an alibi lesson to sort it out.What the hell is this Madam Col. bullshit. I will tell you anything you want to know on the subject. I have been an alert participant for over sixty years. When did your Madam Col. meet Mr. Heyer? Unfortunately I like to call a spade a spade even if its on the blog. Especially when I was subject to a lesson in horse trsining finesse in this public forum. Please spare me all the bullshit.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 17,2008 John Herriott posted:
john herriott said...I am fortunate to have a rare and old book titled "Breaking and Riding" with "military comments" by James Fillis.
It is an excellent book on all phases of high school riding a nd training. It is not dated, but I would suggest it goes back to the turn of the previous century. I have had it for many years and have read and refreered to it many times during my training and riding days and it covers all aspects on the subject in a no nonsense fashion.

On April 19, 2008 this photo of James Fillis from John Herriotts book was posted:


You will note "head a little beyond the vertical", which I asked about on March 11th, and John Herriott responded, "what the hell is vertical, please enlighten me, and we don't need an alibi lesson to sort it out." I think he also insinuated James Fillis was a member of the "horsey set", as they call a high trot, a Spanish trot. I am also assuming "no nonsense fashion", is the same thing as "spare me the bullshit" but I may be wrong.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"3 step"; right diagonal in the air; perfectly in hand; head a little beyond
the vertical; and jaw bent. Passage below, same deal.

William Heyer is behind the vertical as I was suggesting on March 11th, and John Herriott didn't understand what vertical was. Now that James Fillis and the rest of the "horsey set" have "schooled" us. Behind the vertical will often occur when an attempt is made to "lift" the front end of the horse up, instead of "pushing" it up with with the rear hock engaging and driving forward. An important deal called collection. When the curb is poking the horse in the chest, your hands may be a little "heavy" also. If you manage to get the croup/hocks engaged, you may want to let him go "a little beyond the vertical"

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hesitating to criticise this old master, the photo is there so "I'm going for it".The Fillis photo is ghastly, his legs and toes are pointed down and spur directly into the horse, the horse's mouth is wide open in a gaping fashion, I see no beauty in this Spanish or high trot which ever way it is called. I will guarantee this rider was swinging back and forth in order to keep this trick alive. I think we excuse it because he was famous in his day and was one of the founders of these difficult movements. A high trot is balanced going forward into the bridle, the rider not pulling and holding them up in the air. I find only few horses wish to do this movement and it is a rear wheel drive not front wheel drive. If it is not a effortless and pretty movement then why use it just to say "I can do it". Many riders pull and yank for each leg and are satisfied with a high exciting leg extension, I am not and wish not to be seen moving any part of my body as I understand the horse is suppose to be doing the work, not I. I have put many tricks on my horses and if they don't do it gracefully I don't use it although he may do the movement proficiently. I have had horses that did it effortlessly and beautiful and others that looked like crippled ducks. My taste is pretty.

Anonymous said...

I am in total agreement in your remarks in regard to the Fillis Photo, Diane. But I still say that Albert was not correct at all in his photo as well. I not Heyer is riding in the high trot photo on a very tight rein and all of tghe three saddlebred horses I have trained for the "High Trot" required a tight rein a strong leg to enhance the high trot from the more comfortable [for the horse] passage that the could easily drift into, and in fact my high trot always comes from a quick passage and then enhancing it to the slower cadence and higher elevation High Trot. By leg , I mean not going back and foreth but a strong forward emphasis. Fillis did say the majic word for every rider and trainer, FOREWARD< FOREWARD.

Anonymous said...

Of course I agree forward is the word of the day. I submit this photo of a long line horse of mine, one of the first I trained years ago doing the high trot. I am sure Wade will put it up for me in the right place as I haven't figured out how to upload a picture yet on the blog. He is also going up into the bridle in a collected and comfortable position, noticed also that he is also trotting behind and not a swashed walk.

Albert was different than I, he did more difficult and not so pretty tricks and I stayed with pretty and light, this I believe is the difference between Albert and I. After a few years away from him I found I could not ride his horses any longer. The lightness came from my schooling with Dorita Knoyot who weighed all of 80 pounds and she made me the back door instead of meeting these huge animals head on. This does not diminish the greatness of Ostermaier only that we are all different. I am eternally grateful to Dorita for what she gave me. I do suggest through that the tight rein might be the wrong description, I would substitute instead "pushed up into the bridle". A tight rein suggests holding back and except for gaining height the trot would be lost.