Saturday, April 5, 2008

Assorted elephant pictures #3 4/05/08

Here is an interesting thread that was started today. It started as a "shot" at "somebody across the water" but quickly turned into a educational thread. And who better to educate us, then one of the Deans of the subject of elephants. Until the censorship started that is. Then it turned into a football game with hand offs, pitches, laterals, and reverses.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


BMills1

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

2 up and 4 down. Is this good training or not training enough?
Bob Kitto

johnny said...

A good example of the number of elephants from across the water with "paralized beaks". Seems like more than we had in this country. Wonder why? I believe if they could have "trunked up" the great trainer, Mr. Gindle, would have had them doing just that. I note that he also trained great "liberty horses" and Zebras, etc.

Wade G. Burck said...

Johnny,
What causes a "paralyzed beak?" And why point out the ones across the water? There are a load of those "beaks" right here in the good old USA.
Regards,
Wade Burck

Jim Z said...

Col. they also seem to be prolapsed.....at least the one on the veiwers left....and by the way they are standing..I will assume they all are...Yet I remember seeing a Photo with you and 3 punks a few weeks ago...not all were trunked up....was that due to the photographers timing...or were they paralized also??...The reason I am pointing this out is so Folks don't assume they are paralized by only seeing them in a photo with there trunks not up...When one looks at a Elephant photo a educated eye will see more....Jim Zajicek P.S. I believe the trunks worked fine on the punks..I assume they were sniffin the jelly-beans in your pocket......

Wade G. Burck said...

Jim Zijcek,
Excellent. I was wondering when the prolapse was going to be pointed out, once the trunks were, and someone with your "limited knowledge" saw it. Or wanted to see it. Well done. Notice the sides on the elephant on the end. Did you ever see another one with ribs that bulged like that?
I watched a trainer I admire very much, retire a stiff legged elephant, with a tear in his eye, and the vow, "I will never teach an elephant to do a teeterboard again. That kind of integrity is awful rare. How important is experience. The training of the behavior, or knowing the end result years later, and not training it.
Wade Burck

Wade G. Burck said...

Johnny or Buckles,
You've both been around awhile, and are probably more qualified then any of us to address this. What causes a "paralyzed beak/trunk?" Hawthorns big five act had two out of the five exhibiting the behavior, and I believe they made one trip across the water.
I have noted it more in elephants from one "particular" country, so it might be "regional."

Buckles said...

I have always been of the opinion that this comes from a vitamin deficiency. Elephants with mud shows that move from town to town seven days a week have the fewest number with this malady since they get ample grazing, including the dirt, at a variety of locations.
Elephants that stand on boards most of their lives are denied this and appear to show a higher number of weak trunks.

Wade G. Burck said...

Buckles,
Excellent. Your observation of "boards" also point to the island nation, not Europe, where the malady is most prevalent, but doesn't address concrete floors of coliseums.
The vitamin deficiency can be reversed, if done soon enough, but as you noted mud show elephants can still have it. Will "trauma" to the weakened muscle turn it into a permanent disfigurement, as has been noted in studies.
Thank you,
Wade Burck

____________________________________________________________________

The next post which never ran said:

Buckles,
In the studies that have been done, it was found that pairs of elephants, or herds stabled beside each other on the same "substrate" their whole lives, some had the "malady" of the paralyzed "beak/trunk" and some did not. It has been suggested that the "affliction", might be behavioral as most, or a large percentage of the animals with it had/have other behavioral issues, such as running, slugging, belligerence, or attacking, suggesting that it might have something else besides a vitamin deficiency accounting for it.
Thank you,
Wade Burck

____________________________________________________________________

History is to be learned from, so that it is not repeated, is a statement quoted in the past by a gentleman more learned then myself. When fans, lovers of this thing of ours, and the new generation of animal trainers starts whining about being pick on, singled out, unfairly targeted, by the zealots, radicals(yes, "some" are, but not all), they need to accept that there may have been a lot in this world to work with. It may make their labor of love more worthwhile, and important. It is about the animals after all, and not just saving an industry. It is hard to accept that something is not perfect, and that the house was dirty. The sooner that is realized, not hidden or ignored over friendships, the soon history will not repeat, and the house will no longer be dirty, and it will be spotless clean.
Wade Burck

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey Wade, I left comment #20 about two hours ago. It was an address to you saying that a good modern comparison like you were mentioning would Ringling's Rebecca and Zina, both from Billy Smart in England. Zina is totally paralyzed and at the CEC and I was wondering if anybody knew the status of Rebecca. Sorry it keeps happening to you my friend, but keep asking the hard questions.

Wade G. Burck said...

Joey,
Sorry friend, I didn't realize I had to moderate the posts through. It is easier to sit in the back seat and tell Buckles how to drive. LOL I should whack a comment just to get that feeling of power and invincibility. Just kidding. It will never happen.
You don't know how many times "paralyzed trunks" has been referenced to me in 33 years. ALWAYS to point out another trainers inadequacies. Never to adress a solution or answer. As we have all seen brilliantly,by John Herriotts comment, and Buckles avoidance of the issues. And such is the nature of this Circus beast.
Up until about 10 years ago EVERYBODY said it was because the trunk had been cut through training at the base of the trunk on the underside, and struck on the upperside just below the forehead bulge. Scientific research has shown it can occur in the foresting industry when elephants receive an injury/wound to the trunk, lifting/moving logs. 10 years ago a lot started saying it was a "vitamin deficiency" which really sounds like a convenient patch or a very isolated case. And vitamin shots hurt nothing, but do they really help? Nobody will address why elephants standing side by side for years, eating the exact same thing, one will have it and one won't. Years ago, I did a lot of unscientific, granted inadequate "research" and study on my own. I found it has not occured in elephants modern elephants TODAY. Old age? I think not. As every elephant with it, had it by the time they were 10, as old pictures of them note. It is much more prevalent in Europe, very, very prevalent in England. Nutritional, as suggested because the practice is to keep elephants on "boards" as noted, for sanitary reasons. I think not as ours are kept on concrete, and mud show elephants exhibit it also, and they are on dirt.
What I did find, was an alarming connection to behavioral problems, and who trained them when they were babies.
And it's prevalence in England. Now here is where it gets dicey and people get angry. The circus is a small close knit fraternity as close to isolation and it's own rules/practicees as an Amish community or band of Pygmys in an undiscovered jungle. One of the oldest, closest, knit is/was in England originating is the Gypsy caravans of yore. You will not meet anybody who is not related to somebody, who is related to somebody, who is related to somebody, etc. A source of pride is to point to 9/10 generations or 200 years of lineage. In this tight community situation when a small number of individuals practice a craft(ie. witch doctor/physicians they are revered as Gods and their passed on methods are adhered to diligently. In isolated area of Turkey there are today bears with rings in their noses, feet tendered with fire offered as "dancing bears," and there is a father teaching a son.
The excuse I didn't do it is very valid. The 3 I was around that had it were 37 42 and 46 when I met them. All three had "issues". One, the 37 year old(who had a history of running) stood with another elephant, who was 38 and so sweet and had a good trunk, side by side for 36 years on the same surface eating the same food.
How many zoo elephants with the "paralyzed" trunk are old retired circus elephants? We are in agreement on why they go to a zoo, I assume.
Methods change, move out of the dark ages, and that is for the better. But to avoid or look away from the history is removing a great learning tool.
A few revered individuals in the Tenn. Walking horse industry long ago came up with "soreing", chains, "rattlers", elongated hooves, acid, etc. as a means to get the high action. It was copied and emulated, until they finally said stop, this is no good. They should be applauded for that, and they are, but they also reference their history. Doesn't matter who get's offended, "if the shoe fits".
As modern surgeons point to civil war amputations as the vehicle that lead/taught us todays methods, if our industry would address the same history, our craft may not seem so offensive. It is why old pictures, and old antedotes are often used in the AR battle. They bring it up, and we run and hide. If that shoe fits your grandfather, or your ancestors, so be it. But it is affecting us now, and will for future generations. Acknowledge the past, and LET IT GO, move forward with your new found knowledge.
Wade Burck