June 8, 2011
Four elephants tore down the streets of the Indian city of Mysore June
8, killing a man. According to news reports from India, they had become
separated from their herd after villagers threw rocks at them.
One of those elephants ended up in city streets, where it trampled the man and killed several cows.
Elephants are generally regarded as gentle giants. Why would they become enraged to the point of killing?
"From the video, it looked to me like the elephants were young males
who had been separated from their herd," Mike Keele, director of
elephant habitats at the Oregon Zoo, told Life's Little Mysteries.
"Young males can form these bachelor groups which are like little
gangs."
Keele adds that humans can share the blame with the pachyderms: As
elephants get squeezed into smaller and smaller spaces by humans, they
will often wander into human places just for survival – looking for food
and water. If the villagers tried to chase them from their fields,
elephants easily could end up scared and desperate in the streets of a
city.
When the elephants rampaged in Mysore, Keele says, they were probably
just lashing out and trying to get away from perceived attacks, a sort
of aggressive defensive tactic. "In a situation where an elephant is
frightened and frantic, anything that moves is fair game. The elephant's
thought process is: 'It moves and therefore it's a threat to me.'"
Stressed-out elephants
Other experts see a deeper level of traumatic injury in human/elephant
conflicts. "Incidents like this show the extent to which elephants are
being driven to madness by human violence," says Gay Bradshaw, an
elephant behavior expert who wrote the book 'Elephants on the Edge'
(Yale University Press, October, 2009). "That's scientifically
documented, consistent with what we know from research in neuroscience,
psychology and psychiatry."
Bradshaw says elephants are simply reacting as people would when under
siege. People are shooting, spearing, poisoning the big animals: "From a
psychologist's perspective, that's trauma. If you look at elephants and
people, that's the same thing we see with people under siege and
genocide."
Bradshaw likens the conflict between humans and elephants to
colonialism, with the people taking over the elephants' indigenous
culture, and with "elephants fighting to keep their culture and their
society as they are pushed into smaller places and killed outright."
Part of the conflict is simply over resources. In Asia, there are
between 35,000 and 50,000 elephants — and an enormous human population.
By comparison, elephants in Africa number 600,000, and the human
population is lower than in Asia.
Elephants need a large space to roam, with lots of vegetation and
abundant water supplies to help them digest all that roughage. When
those areas are taken up with human crops, elephants are happy to adjust
to eating corn or other plants meant for people. Sometimes they become a
bit too happy with human foods: They will enter villages and destroy
huts or houses if they smell food, says Marshall Jones, senior
conservation adviser at the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute.
Jones has analyzed the number of fatalities in human/elephant conflict
zones. He estimates that in India up to 300 people die from elephants
per year, and as many as 200 elephants per year are killed in the
conflict.
"It's actually amazing how tolerant people in Asia are towards
elephants already," he said. "If there were an animal in the United
States that was killing hundreds of people per year, it would be gone."
Still, these experts agree it's up to humans to promote harmony. One
idea, according to Keele, is to put fences around human villages instead
of around elephant areas: Confine the people, not the animals.
Bradshaw says people need to stop committing violent acts against
elephants, take down roads and railroads that cause deaths, and create
better elephant corridors with enough food and water so the animals
don't need to wander into human areas.
"Humans are very plastic as a species," she says. "The only thing we lack is willpower."
"If there were an animal in the United
States that was killing hundreds of people per year, it would be gone."
'For Dr. Joyce Poole and Gay Bradshaw, can you name one animal, just one, that would be allowed to survive if it was killing hundred of people per year in either Europe, England, or the United States?'
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Posted by
Wade G. Burck
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment