Sunday, March 8, 2009

Britain's Clown Shortage: Visa Rules Hit the Circus

Circus performers can twist themselves into pretzels and somersault through rings of fire, but even they are struggling to jump through new hoops set up by the U.K. immigration authorities. In November, the British Home Office introduced a points-based system to crack down on illegal immigration and create what its website describes as "a significantly more straightforward and transparent structure." It's easy enough for foreign trapeze artists and acrobats to secure the requisite points for entry into Britain based on their unique skills. But ringmasters say various problems with the new system — including faulty computer software and poorly trained embassy staff — are preventing international talent from reaching Britain's big tops.

"My season started in February," says Martin Lacey, owner of the Great British Circus, "and I've got comedy acrobats stranded in the Ukraine and Mongolian horse riders who were refused their visas in Ulaanbaatar." The holes in his lineup have forced Lacey to draft last-minute substitutes. "Our Mexican clown is stuck in Mexico, so we've got a trapeze artist pretending to be a stooge just to get everybody out of trouble," he says. "It's a mess." (See 10 things to do in London.)

And it's totally incompatible with the needs of Britain's circus sector. According to Malcolm Clay, secretary of the Association of Circus Proprietors of Great Britain, British circus schools don't produce artists at an acceptable standard, largely because their students refine skills like tightrope-walking or fire-breathing as a hobby, not as part of a lifelong career. As a result, British circuses rely on artists from countries with long-established histories of state-sponsored circus schools: they call on Argentina and Colombia for their renowned high-wire acts, China and North Korea for acrobats, and Mongolia and Russia for horse riders. (Interestingly, they don't need to import bearded ladies.) About 500 circus performers enter the U.K. annually, and roughly half of them must obtain short-term visas because they come from outside the European Union.

"It's a pity, but this problem is all over Europe," says Arie Oudenes, managing director of the European Circus Association, a trade group that represents the interests of 120 circuses. But British proprietors believe that Britain's red tape has made their challenge more acute. The website through which foreign applicants must now register has reportedly crashed multiple times. Plus, there's a more general question of access. "A lot of families in Mongolia don't have computers," Lacey says. "These are genuine riders who tend to their horses and work with their flocks when they're not working in the circus. To ask them to go online and fill out a form is just crazy. They can get to the nearest town and post a letter, and that's about it." (See pictures from the circus.)

Performers must also leave their passports with British embassies for up to two weeks, a regulation that doesn't suit the itinerant lifestyle of circus stars, whose contracts may see them tumbling or clowning in several countries within the span of a month.

But circuses know that the show must go on, and they're already taking action. On March 3, Clay testified before the House of Commons' Home Affairs Select Committee about the need to bring embassy workers up to speed on the rules and to rework technicalities. Recently, Clay says, dancers, musicians and tumblers from Zimbabwe who have performed at British festivals every year since 1998 were rejected because embassy staff felt the troupe could not prove it had sufficient funds to support itself in the U.K., despite having contracts and a spotless track record. "How can they [show sufficient funds], with Zimbabwe's appalling rate of inflation?" he asks. (See pictures of London.)

Despite its hiccups, the new system does improve upon its predecessor. Previously, a Venezuelan juggler would have to fly back to Caracas to apply for an extension, and by the time he made it back to England, his troupe may have moved on to Italy; now he can apply while working in the U.K. The old system also gave British embassies too much discretion in determining whether performers deserved their visas. Clay remembers a particularly troublesome ordeal last year involving a Chinese trapeze act, in which two boys swinging on distant lines would throw a somersaulting female performer between them. "The embassy gave visas to the two boys because they had previously worked in the West," he recalls, "but they refused the girl simply because she hadn't."

Now host circuses can vouch for a performer's suitability using their own criteria — a way of passing the responsibility for compliance from the Home Office to the employer. "If an artist doesn't behave, then it's going to reflect on us," Clay says. Of course, in an industry where men and women can twirl machetes blindfolded while standing on wild horses, it's a risk they're happy to take.

Courtesy of Casey Cainan

Western Horsemanship Dressage



Madame Col., This was sent with a request that you critique it, and give your thoughts.

Molly the Camel


A new French Foreign Legion Captain was assigned to an outfit in a remote post in the
Arabian desert .

During his first inspection of the outfit, he noticed a camel hitched up
behind the mess tent.

He asks the Sergeant why the camel is kept there, as the Legion doesn't use them anymore.

The nervous sergeant said, "Well sir, as you know, there are 250 men here
on the post and no women.
And sir, sometimes the men have 'urges'. That's why we have Molly the
camel."

The Captain says, "I can't say that I condone this, but I understand
about 'urges', so the camel can stay."

About a month later, the Captain starts having his own 'urges'. Crazy with
passion, he asks the Sergeant to bring the camel to his tent.

Putting a ladder behind the camel, the Captain stands on the ladder, pulls
his pants down and has wild, insane sex with the camel.

When he's done, he asks the Sergeant, "Is that how the men do it?"

"No, not really, sir. They usually just ride the camel into town where
the girls are."



Courtesy of Name Withheld

Minor injuries in Fairgrounds stairway collapse

y Kron heard the thud and braced for the worst Saturday morning.

As a line of children waited for their turn riding a circus elephant at the Pepsi Coliseum, the 8,300-pound pachyderm brushed against a nearby platform and portable stairway, knocking it over.

A Murat Shrine Circus worker fell from the top of the 6-foot stairway used to load and unload passengers, and about a dozen children aged 8-12 were knocked around in the confusion — but no one was seriously injured.

The platform wasn’t damaged, the show went on without interruption and the Asian elephant returned to give rides during intermission of that same show, said Kron, marketing and public relations chairman for the circus, which the coliseum is hosting this weekend.

“Just to show how minor it was, there was a line of people to ride the elephant at that intermission who were there when it happened,” he said.

“We will continue to offer elephant rides throughout the weekend and are confident in the safety of those rides.

“I have been in this business 21 years, and this is the first time anything like this ever happened. We are considering it a freak accident.”

Indianapolis firefighters were called about 9:45 a.m. to the coliseum at the Indiana State Fairgrounds, 1202 E. 38th St.

All of the injured were treated at first-aid stands at the fairgrounds.

“One paramedic likened them to injuries you might see on a playground. Bumps and scrapes.” said Indianapolis Fire Department spokeswoman Rita Reith.

The circus continued as scheduled with three performances Saturday. It concludes today with shows at 11:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m.

Courtesy of Joey Ratliff

Cage Wagon--Ringling Museum

Australian Winnebago

Unknown Presenter

Unknown Presenter

Artsy Circus Photos






Fernando Botero--Monte Carlo Art Festival

Frank Buck





Frank Buck



Fury





Madison Square Garden--1908

Downie Bros. Paper--1936

Animal trainer Hans Brick playing with a tiger at Chessington Zoo, England, 1933

Along the same insightful thoughts as Jamie Clubb, I would direct you to Author Showbiz Dave's thread posted on Feb. 27, 2009


I found this fascinating quote today:



Very often con-theos are pseudosceptics by design. They start with a preconceived conclusion and then progress with a confirmation bias. Such an approach means that they are prone to nitpick for details they feel contradict the established view and support their own. Often in the recording martial arts and circus history I have noticed that too much has been provided by anecdotal evidence and, worse still, qualified by the appeal to authority logical fallacy argument. This is why I don't like to see any historical figure to be presented in a saintly or devilish light. I want "warts 'n all" accounts so that I can humanize the figure and get closer to the truth.Jamie Clubb, Jamie Clubb - author of "The Legend of Salt and Sauce", Mar 2009



You should read the whole article.


Wikipedia

An appeal to authority or argument by authority is a type of argument in logic. It bases the truth value of an assertion on the authority, knowledge, expertise, or position of the source asserting it. It is also known as argument from authority, argumentum ad verecundiam (Latin: argument to respect) or ipse dixit (Latin: he himself said it). [1]

It is one method of obtaining propositional knowledge, but a fallacy in regard to syllogistic logic, because the validity of a syllogism is independent of the qualities of the source putting it forward. The converse case is an ad hominem attack: to imply that a claim is false because the asserter lacks authority or is otherwise objectionable in some way.

On the other hand, arguments from authority are an important part of informal logic. Since we cannot have detailed knowledge of a great many topics, we must often rely on the judgments of those who do. There is no fallacy involved in simply arguing that the assertion made by an authority is true, in contrast to claiming that the authority is infallible in principle and can hence be exempted from criticism: It can be true, the truth can merely not be proven, or made probable by attributing it to the authority, and the assumption that the assertion was true might be subject to criticism and turn out to have actually been wrong. If a criticism appears that contradicts the authority's statement, then merely the fact that the statement originated from the authority is not an argument for ignoring the criticism.

Recommended reading to understand better the problems facing the captive elephant industry

I found this fascinating quote today:



A pseudosceptic can also be a cynic. They can take the position of doubt without even hearing the case, which is not good history or science. The position of the good sceptic is to say "that sounds like a really interesting idea. Please prove it". The good sceptic/scientist/historian has to also ask himself as well as the person he is in conflict with: "Is there anything that woudl make you change your stance?" It's an argument put forward by the famous sceptic and magician James Randi. It's a wonderful starting point. If you or your debater says there is nothing that could be provided that would change their point of view then the argument is already over.Jamie Clubb, Jamie Clubb - author of "The Legend of Salt and Sauce", Mar 2009



You should read the whole article.